Loading…
Stat Explorer
Sortable, filterable leaderboards across every tracked metric.
As-of weekAs of Week 12, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–12 only. Uses no game after Week 12.
370 players · 5 metrics · click a column to sort
Stat leaders
370 players
Stat leaders
370 players
TeamNOGames11Opportunities256Snap share72%Target share23%Fantasy points (PPR)220Opportunity Score (proxy)0.77
TeamPHIGames11Opportunities256Snap share72%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)266Opportunity Score (proxy)0.56
TeamLARGames11Opportunities238Snap share88%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)181Opportunity Score (proxy)0.59
TeamBALGames12Opportunities233Snap share56%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)240Opportunity Score (proxy)0.41
TeamGBGames11Opportunities232Snap share65%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)182Opportunity Score (proxy)0.59
TeamTENGames11Opportunities229Snap share72%Target share14%Fantasy points (PPR)155Opportunity Score (proxy)0.60
TeamPITGames11Opportunities222Snap share·Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)135Opportunity Score (proxy)0.47
TeamHOUGames9Opportunities219Snap share66%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)190Opportunity Score (proxy)0.47
TeamCARGames11Opportunities217Snap share73%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)177Opportunity Score (proxy)0.63
TeamATLGames11Opportunities217Snap share72%Target share16%Fantasy points (PPR)201Opportunity Score (proxy)0.56
TeamMINGames11Opportunities216Snap share64%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)160Opportunity Score (proxy)0.56
TeamNYJGames11Opportunities213Snap share78%Target share17%Fantasy points (PPR)183Opportunity Score (proxy)0.67
TeamCHIGames11Opportunities204Snap share64%Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)157Opportunity Score (proxy)0.51
TeamARIGames11Opportunities201Snap share64%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)160Opportunity Score (proxy)0.54
TeamNEGames11Opportunities197Snap share63%Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)142Opportunity Score (proxy)0.46
TeamLACGames11Opportunities192Snap share64%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)166Opportunity Score (proxy)0.49
De'Von AchaneRBQUESTIONABLETeamMIAGames11Opportunities187Snap share59%Target share16%Fantasy points (PPR)191Opportunity Score (proxy)0.52
TeamDETGames11Opportunities186Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)207Opportunity Score (proxy)0.52
TeamCINGames11Opportunities184Snap share·Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)158Opportunity Score (proxy)0.52
TeamINDGames9Opportunities183Snap share81%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)·Opportunity Score (proxy)·
TeamKCGames8Opportunities177Snap share60%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)·Opportunity Score (proxy)·
TeamDETGames11Opportunities171Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)179Opportunity Score (proxy)0.43
TeamSEAGames9Opportunities171Snap share64%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)161Opportunity Score (proxy)0.49
TeamDENGames12Opportunities168Snap share56%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)·Opportunity Score (proxy)0.42
TeamDALGames11Opportunities131Snap share·Target share30%Fantasy points (PPR)192Opportunity Score (proxy)0.60
Showing 5 of 46 metrics. Add more from the “Cuts, columns & filters” drawerMetrics rail. Universe = the union of every tracked metric’s leaderboard (top players per metric), merged into one row per player. Blank (·) = outside that metric’s leaders. Widening to the full roster needs a data-export change (tracked separately).
Trending usage: Risers
Usage momentum: the slope of snap share, target share, opportunities and red-zone touches over a trailing 4-week window, blended per position. Earliest breakout detector. Noise-guarded descriptive trajectory.
Rank by
WR · Risers
As of Week 12, 2024
Noise-guard: ≥3 wk · ≥12 snaps
| # | Player | Momentum | Now | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Curtis SamuelWR BUF | +2.34 | 60%from 58% | 3 wk42 snaps |
| 2 |  David MooreWR CAR | +1.94 | 94%from 88% | 3 wk51 snaps |
| 3 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | +1.73 | 76%from 65% | 3 wk45 snaps |
| 4 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | +1.61 | 80%from 67% | 4 wk43 snaps |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | +1.43 | 99%from 94% | 3 wk74 snaps |
| 6 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | +1.33 | 89%from 77% | 4 wk55 snaps |
| 7 |  Khalil ShakirWRBUF | +1.33 | 71%from 65% | 3 wk47 snaps |
| 8 |  Tyler BoydWR TEN | +1.32 | 57%from 52% | 4 wk32 snaps |
| 9 |  Marquez Valdes-ScantlingWR NO | +1.14 | 65%from 54% | 3 wk33 snaps |
| 10 |  Devaughn VeleWR DEN | +1.04 | 65%from 60% | 4 wk38 snaps |
| 11 |  DJ TurnerWR LV | +1.03 | 62%from 46% | 3 wk32 snaps |
| 12 |  Joshua PalmerWR LAC | +0.99 | 83%from 68% | 4 wk44 snaps |
| 13 |  Xavier GipsonWR NYJ | +0.82 | 53%from 37% | 3 wk20 snaps |
| 14 |  Rome OdunzeWR CHI | +0.74 | 87%from 81% | 4 wk58 snaps |
| 15 |  Jordan AddisonWR MIN | +0.73 | 94%from 80% | 4 wk60 snaps |
| 16 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | +0.70 | 75%from 79% | 3 wk48 snaps |
| 17 |  Jakobi MeyersWRLV | +0.68 | 99%from 95% | 3 wk64 snaps |
| 18 |  Keenan AllenWRCHI | +0.68 | 89%from 92% | 4 wk65 snaps |
| 19 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | +0.60 | 94%from 90% | 3 wk44 snaps |
| 20 |  Jameson WilliamsWR DET | +0.50 | 83%from 74% | 3 wk53 snaps |
| 21 |  Johnny WilsonWRPHI | +0.50 | 70%from 40% | 4 wk29 snaps |
| 22 |  Xavier WorthyWR KC | +0.49 | 64%from 66% | 4 wk47 snaps |
| 23 |  Tim PatrickWRDET | +0.48 | 50%from 62% | 4 wk42 snaps |
| 24 |  Michael WilsonWR ARI | +0.46 | 83%from 73% | 3 wk43 snaps |
WR · Risers
As of Week 12, 2024
Noise-guard: ≥3 wk · ≥12 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +2.34
- Now
- 60%from 58%
- Window
- 3 wk42 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.94
- Now
- 94%from 88%
- Window
- 3 wk51 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.73
- Now
- 76%from 65%
- Window
- 3 wk45 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.61
- Now
- 80%from 67%
- Window
- 4 wk43 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.43
- Now
- 99%from 94%
- Window
- 3 wk74 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.33
- Now
- 89%from 77%
- Window
- 4 wk55 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.33
- Now
- 71%from 65%
- Window
- 3 wk47 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.32
- Now
- 57%from 52%
- Window
- 4 wk32 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.14
- Now
- 65%from 54%
- Window
- 3 wk33 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.04
- Now
- 65%from 60%
- Window
- 4 wk38 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.99
- Now
- 83%from 68%
- Window
- 4 wk44 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.82
- Now
- 53%from 37%
- Window
- 3 wk20 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.74
- Now
- 87%from 81%
- Window
- 4 wk58 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.73
- Now
- 94%from 80%
- Window
- 4 wk60 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.70
- Now
- 75%from 79%
- Window
- 3 wk48 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.68
- Now
- 99%from 95%
- Window
- 3 wk64 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.68
- Now
- 89%from 92%
- Window
- 4 wk65 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.60
- Now
- 94%from 90%
- Window
- 3 wk44 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.50
- Now
- 83%from 74%
- Window
- 3 wk53 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.50
- Now
- 70%from 40%
- Window
- 4 wk29 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.49
- Now
- 64%from 66%
- Window
- 4 wk47 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.48
- Now
- 50%from 62%
- Window
- 4 wk42 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.46
- Now
- 83%from 73%
- Window
- 3 wk43 snaps
Boards are eligible-only. Every row already clears the noise floor (≥3 played weeks and ≥12 average snaps in the window), so a one-week spike never registers. A trend is descriptive, never a prediction.
Schedule strength by position
Easiest → hardest remaining schedule per team. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate.
WR · Rest-of-season schedule
Remaining opponents from week 1 forward — the trade/streaming horizon.
100 = league avg · >100 softer
| # ▲ | Team | Schedule | SOS index | Avg opp DvP | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHI | Easy | 108 | 6.44 | 17 |
| 2 |  HOU | Easy | 104 | 6.22 | 17 |
| 3 | MIN | Easy | 104 | 6.20 | 17 |
| 4 |  DAL | Easy | 104 | 6.18 | 17 |
| 5 |  NYG | Easy | 104 | 6.17 | 17 |
| 6 | JAX | Easy | 103 | 6.16 | 17 |
| 7 | TEN | Easy | 103 | 6.17 | 17 |
| 8 |  SEA | Easy | 103 | 6.12 | 17 |
| 9 |  CLE | Easy | 102 | 6.11 | 17 |
| 10 |  WSH | Easy | 102 | 6.07 | 17 |
| 11 | CIN | Average | 102 | 6.06 | 17 |
| 12 | ARI | Average | 101 | 6.04 | 17 |
| 13 | NO | Average | 101 | 6.00 | 17 |
| 14 |  GB | Average | 100 | 5.96 | 17 |
| 15 | IND | Average | 100 | 5.96 | 17 |
| 16 |  TB | Average | 100 | 5.95 | 17 |
| 17 | DET | Average | 99 | 5.92 | 17 |
| 18 | LAR | Average | 99 | 5.92 | 17 |
| 19 | BUF | Average | 99 | 5.91 | 17 |
| 20 |  SF | Average | 99 | 5.90 | 17 |
| 21 | ATL | Average | 99 | 5.89 | 17 |
| 22 |  BAL | Average | 98 | 5.84 | 17 |
| 23 |  MIA | Hard | 98 | 5.83 | 17 |
| 24 | CAR | Hard | 98 | 5.82 | 17 |
| 25 | KC | Hard | 97 | 5.81 | 17 |
| 26 | DEN | Hard | 97 | 5.81 | 17 |
| 27 | LAC | Hard | 97 | 5.80 | 17 |
| 28 |  NE | Hard | 97 | 5.80 | 17 |
| 29 |  PIT | Hard | 96 | 5.74 | 17 |
| 30 | NYJ | Hard | 96 | 5.73 | 17 |
| 31 | CHI | Hard | 96 | 5.72 | 17 |
| 32 | LV | Hard | 95 | 5.64 | 17 |
WR · Rest-of-season schedule
Remaining opponents from week 1 forward — the trade/streaming horizon.
100 = league avg · >100 softer
Easiest rank1ScheduleEasySOS index108Avg opp DvP6.44Games17
Easiest rank2ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.22Games17
Easiest rank3ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.20Games17
Easiest rank4ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.18Games17
Easiest rank5ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.17Games17
Easiest rank6ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.16Games17
Easiest rank7ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.17Games17
Easiest rank8ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.12Games17
Easiest rank9ScheduleEasySOS index102Avg opp DvP6.11Games17
Easiest rank10ScheduleEasySOS index102Avg opp DvP6.07Games17
Easiest rank11ScheduleAverageSOS index102Avg opp DvP6.06Games17
Easiest rank12ScheduleAverageSOS index101Avg opp DvP6.04Games17
Easiest rank13ScheduleAverageSOS index101Avg opp DvP6.00Games17
Easiest rank14ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.96Games17
Easiest rank15ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.96Games17
Easiest rank16ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.95Games17
Easiest rank17ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.92Games17
Easiest rank18ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.92Games17
Easiest rank19ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.91Games17
Easiest rank20ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.90Games17
Easiest rank21ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.89Games17
Easiest rank22ScheduleAverageSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.84Games17
Easiest rank23ScheduleHardSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.83Games17
Easiest rank24ScheduleHardSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.82Games17
Easiest rank25ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.81Games17
Easiest rank26ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.81Games17
Easiest rank27ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.80Games17
Easiest rank28ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.80Games17
Easiest rank29ScheduleHardSOS index96Avg opp DvP5.74Games17
Easiest rank30ScheduleHardSOS index96Avg opp DvP5.73Games17
Easiest rank31ScheduleHardSOS index96Avg opp DvP5.72Games17
Easiest rank32ScheduleHardSOS index95Avg opp DvP5.64Games17
100 = league-average schedule for the position; >100 softer, <100 tougher. sos_index = mean(opponent dvp / league-mean dvp for the position) × 100, so it is comparable across positions.
Pick a position to see per-metric leader cards.
Leaderboards are descriptive. For accountable start/sit calls, see Calls.