Loading…
Hunter Henry
TE · NE
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
20.2
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs SEA: allows 14.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs SEA
contextvs SEA: 1 game, 18.9 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 |  NE | vs SEA | 12 | 8 | 109 | 0 | 18.9 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %58%
Target share25%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
96Hard
#28 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
100Average
#18 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
96Hard
#28 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- How will Patriots QB Drake Maye adjust to new cent...www.espn.com · 2026-07-26
- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
- Fantasy Football: Tight ends to avoid based on touchdown dependencywww.pff.com · 2026-07-09
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs MIA | 5 | 5 | 56 | 0 | 58% | 25% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ NYJ | 3 | 3 | 49 | 1 | 65% | 12% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ BAL | 7 | 6 | 35 | 1 | 81% | 17% | 15.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs BUF | 3 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 87% | 14% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs NYG | 6 | 4 | 73 | 0 | 75% | 20% | 11.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ CIN | 10 | 7 | 115 | 1 | 79% | 30% | 24.5 |
| 2025 W11 | vsNYJ | 6 | 4 | 45 | 0 | 94% | 18% | 8.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ TB | 4 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 87% | 14% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ATL | 6 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 75% | 21% | 9.1 |
| 2025 W8 | vs CLE | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 76% | 4% | 7.7 |
| 2025 W7 | @ TEN | 5 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 68% | 21% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NO | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 83% | 13% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @BUF | 4 | 2 | 46 | 0 | 87% | 14% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CAR | 2 | 2 | 39 | 1 | 76% | 12% | 11.9 |
| 2025 W3 | vs PIT | 11 | 8 | 90 | 2 | 81% | 31% | 29.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @MIA | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 85% | 13% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs LV | 8 | 4 | 66 | 0 | 93% | 18% | 10.6 |
| 2024 W17 | vs LAC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 9% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim52%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 42%
of 12 Start calls
🟡 50%
of 12 Flex calls
🔴 67%
of 9 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | MIA | FLEX | 9.2 | TE11 (10.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | NYJ | START | 11.1 | TE7 (13.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | BAL | START | 10.6 | TE7 (15.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | BUF | FLEX | 10.6 | TE46 (2.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | NYG | FLEX | 10.7 | TE12 (11.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CIN | SIT | 8.4 | TE1 (24.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | NYJ | SIT | 7.9 | TE13 (8.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | TB | SIT | 7.8 | TE43 (1.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | ATL | SIT | 7.2 | TE19 (9.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | CLE | SIT | 7.8 | TE16 (7.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade