
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYJ: allows 14.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jordan Love. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (96/452). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE6), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs NYJ in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Packers took tight end Tucker Kraft off the PUP list on Friday and he will start being phased into the team’s practices over the near future. Tucker Kraft has no hesitation about practicing without a contract extension
source ↗Luke Musgrave is out indefinitely with a neck injury, which could limit Green Bay's ability to play out of multi-tight end sets, even with the return of Tucker Kraft.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 6 | 3 | 65 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 15% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 9% | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 7 | 143 | 2 | – | – | 92% | 26% | 33.3 | 29.8 | 26.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 10 | 5 | 58 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 36% | 16.8 | 14.3 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 43 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 8% | 12.3 | 11.3 | 10.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 5 | 5 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 14% | 10.6 | 8.1 | 5.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 16% | 5.9 | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 7 | 6 | 124 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 26% | 24.4 | 21.4 | 18.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 4 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 92% | 18% | 9.9 | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 28% | 7.6 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 3 | 2 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 10% | 7.3 | 6.3 | 5.3 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 4 | 3 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 62% | 15% | 9.5 | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 8% | 5.4 | 4.4 | 3.4 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 41 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 26% | 13.1 | 11.6 | 10.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 7 | 6 | 78 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 25% | 13.8 | 10.8 | 7.8 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 2 | 2 | 26 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 9% | 10.6 | 9.6 | 8.6 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 6 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 16% | 7.6 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W9 | START | 12.6 | TE38 (4.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 10.2 | TE1 (33.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 9.9 | TE8 (16.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | START | 10.9 | TE11 (12.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 11.2 | TE15 (10.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | FLEX | 10.8 | TE25 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W2 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE1 (24.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 8.2 | TE16 (9.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 7.9 | TE22 (7.6) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | FLEX | 9.1 | TE23 (7.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade