
Why: heavy usage
vs MIN: allows 10.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 9% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 7 | 143 | 2 | – | – | 92% | 26% | 33.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 10 | 5 | 58 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 36% | 16.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 43 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 8% | 12.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 5 | 5 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 14% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 16% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 7 | 6 | 124 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 26% | 24.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 4 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 92% | 18% | 9.9 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 28% | 7.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 3 | 2 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 10% | 7.3 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 4 | 3 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 62% | 15% | 9.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 8% | 5.4 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 41 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 26% | 13.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 7 | 6 | 78 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 25% | 13.8 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 2 | 2 | 26 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 9% | 10.6 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 6% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 6 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 16% | 7.6 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 3 | 3 | 78 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 11% | 16.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W9 | START | 12.6 | TE38 (4.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 10.2 | TE1 (33.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 9.9 | TE8 (16.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | START | 10.9 | TE11 (12.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 11.2 | TE15 (10.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | FLEX | 10.8 | TE25 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W2 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE1 (24.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 8.2 | TE16 (9.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 7.9 | TE22 (7.6) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | FLEX | 9.1 | TE23 (7.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade