
Why: heavy usage
vs DEN: allows 26.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | vs | 11 | 7 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 37% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 8 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 28% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 12 | 8 | 92 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 89% | 38% | 29.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 12 | 8 | 141 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 28% | 24.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 9 | 6 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 21% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 7 | 4 | 80 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 82% | 24% | 18.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 9 | 93 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 86% | 28% | 25.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | – | – | 41% | 29% | 23.2 |
| 2024 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W3 | @ | 14 | 12 | 110 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 74% | 39% | 29.1 |
| 2024 W2 | vs | 6 | 5 | 75 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 27% | 18.5 |
| 2024 W1 | vs | 9 | 7 | 103 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 33% | 17.3 |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 6 | 5 | 127 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 22% | – |
| 2023 W16 | vs | 12 | 6 | 57 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 32% | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 9 | 9 | 91 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 30% | – |
| 2023 W14 | vs | 10 | 7 | 72 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 29% | – |
| 2023 W13 | @ | 9 | 8 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 32% | – |
| 2023 W12 | @ | 10 | 8 | 107 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 31% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 12 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | START | 15.3 | WR31 (12.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 15.9 | WR40 (7.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 15.7 | WR2 (29.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 15.2 | WR6 (24.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 12.1 | WR34 (9.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 14.1 | WR12 (18.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 13.4 | WR2 (25.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 13.3 | WR10 (23.2) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W4 | START | 16.0 | WR145 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W3 | START | 14.3 | WR3 (29.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade