
vs LV: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Justin Fields. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (268/459). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR15), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W10 | @ | 14 | 9 | 93 | 0 | 18.3 | 13.8 | 9.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
New York’s wide receiver room was in constant flux last season, particularly after Garrett Wilson suffered a season-ending injury.
source ↗He could join Garrett Wilson, Adonai Mitchell, Isaiah Williams, and Arian Smith as an option in the passing game while Cooper is out.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vs | 3 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @ | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vs | 11 | 7 | 104 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 38% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @ | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 27% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @ | 13 | 10 | 107 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 36% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 7 | 5 | 57 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 7 | 6 | 79 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 30% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 39% | 27% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 8 | 3 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 53% | 4.3 | 2.8 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 10 | 6 | 71 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 24% | 19.1 | 16.1 | 13.1 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 6 | 82 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 30% | 20.2 | 17.2 | 14.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 13 | 10 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 100% | 37% | 24.4 | 19.4 | 14.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 8 | 4 | 50 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 38% | 9.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 9 | 7 | 95 | 1 | – | – | 100% | 43% | 22.5 | 19.0 | 15.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 5 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 98% | 14% | 9.1 | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 8 | 7 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 26% | 17.6 | 14.1 | 10.6 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 7 | 6 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 17% | 11.4 | 8.4 | 5.4 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 6 | 3 | 56 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 21% | 14.6 | 13.1 | 11.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.