
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs ARI: allows 17.3 PPR/g to QB, rank 13/32 (Average). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 | @ | 27/39 | 349 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 14.8 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
It’s a good problem to have, but he’s doing well.” Chargers Chargers OL Kayode Awosika and Cole Strange are competing for starting spots on the offensive line protecting QB Justin Herbert, and each man gave their thoughts on the competition
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 21/32 | 236 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 0 | 15.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 23/29 | 300 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 1 | 30.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 19/29 | 210 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 12/26 | 139 | 1 | 1 | 66 | 0 | 12.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 15/20 | 151 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 10/18 | 81 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 20/33 | 220 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 14.7 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 19/29 | 250 | 2 | 1 | 57 | 1 | 27.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 18/25 | 227 | 3 | 1 | 62 | 0 | 25.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 37/55 | 420 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 27.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 29/38 | 264 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 18.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 22/29 | 166 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 0 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 23/41 | 203 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 12.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 28/47 | 300 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 19/27 | 242 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 18.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 25/34 | 318 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 27.9 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 28/36 | 346 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 28.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 26/38 | 281 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 24.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 16.1 | QB16 (15.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 14.5 | QB4 (30.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 12.8 | QB27 (10.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 14.7 | QB18 (12.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 17.6 | QB21 (12.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 19.5 | QB31 (3.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 19.8 | QB17 (14.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 19.3 | QB4 (27.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 16.9 | QB4 (25.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 16.3 | QB3 (27.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade