
Why: limited usage
vs MIN: allows 23.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 4 | 4 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 16% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 64% | 13% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 6 | 5 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 10.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 47% | 17% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 5 | 3 | 45 | 1 | – | – | 38% | 23% | 13.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 2 | 2 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 69% | 8% | 5.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 14% | 1.6 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 4 | 3 | 76 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 58% | 15% | 11.1 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 6 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 59% | 23% | 11.1 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 50% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 6 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 67% | 21% | 19.7 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 3 | 3 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 50% | 14% | 5.6 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 2 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 1 | -5 | 57% | 12% | 9.8 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 6 | 5 | 113 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 16% | 16.3 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 3 | 2 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 59% | 11% | 7.5 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 4 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 74% | 12% | 3.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 24 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.3 | WR130 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.3 | WR42 (8.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.1 | WR56 (7.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.4 | WR37 (10.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 6.2 | WR34 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W2 | SIT | 8.4 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 8.7 | WR21 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 7.9 | WR76 (5.1) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 9.6 | WR107 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W16 | SIT | 9.4 | WR40 (11.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade