Loading…
Dallas Goedert
TE · PHI
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
26.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs WSH: allows 15.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 5/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs WSH
contextvs WSH: 4 games, 8.8 PPR avg
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %80%
Target share27%
Opportunities6
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
108Easy
#1 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
103Average
#13 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
108Easy
#1 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Biggest Instant Impact Rookie For Every Teamnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-28
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Tight ends to avoid in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-24
- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
- Copy of Could an NFL roster of only bench players be compe...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ BUF | 6 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 80% | 27% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ WSH | 3 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 87% | 10% | 12.2 |
| 2025 W15 | vs LV | 7 | 6 | 70 | 2 | 74% | 39% | 25.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LAC | 10 | 8 | 78 | 0 | 93% | 26% | 15.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs CHI | 4 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 89% | 13% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W12 | @ DAL | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 92% | 6% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs DET | 5 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 90% | 19% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ GB | 6 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 86% | 26% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs NYG | 3 | 3 | 28 | 2 | 63% | 15% | 17.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ MIN | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 98% | 13% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @NYG | 11 | 9 | 110 | 1 | 89% | 34% | 26.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs DEN | 9 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 79% | 24% | 10.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ TB | 4 | 4 | 37 | 2 | 75% | 17% | 19.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs LAR | 2 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 91% | 7% | 10.3 |
| 2025 W1 | vsDAL | 7 | 7 | 44 | 0 | 83% | 35% | 11.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vsNYG | 6 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 19% | 15% | 9.5 |
| 2024 W13 | @ BAL | 4 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 71% | 24% | 12.5 |
| 2024 W12 | @LAR | 5 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 75% | 26% | 5.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim56%hit rate
25 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 33%
of 12 Start calls
🟡 78%
of 9 Flex calls
🔴 75%
of 4 Sit calls
Based on 25 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | BUF | START | 11.4 | TE15 (9.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | WSH | START | 11.0 | TE14 (12.2) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | LV | FLEX | 8.9 | TE4 (25.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | LAC | SIT | 8.0 | TE5 (15.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | CHI | SIT | 8.6 | TE31 (4.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | DAL | FLEX | 9.1 | TE34 (4.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | DET | START | 11.3 | TE32 (4.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | GB | START | 11.5 | TE18 (8.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W8 | NYG | START | 11.9 | TE5 (17.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | MIN | START | 11.7 | TE31 (4.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade