
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs DET: allows 19.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Josh Allen. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (86/476). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 114 | 0 | 17.3 | 14.8 | 12.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 13 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 33% | 7% | 19.6 | 18.6 | 17.6 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 5 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 38% | 12% | 7.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 26% | 12% | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 2 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 25% | 11% | 5.9 | 4.9 | 3.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 27% | 22% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 45 | 0 | 35% | 10% | 8.2 | 6.7 | 5.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 1 | 32% | 7% | 15.0 | 14.0 | 13.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 40% | 5% | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 20% | 8% | 10.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 42% | 8% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 25% | 7% | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 4% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 4% | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 7% | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.3 | RB6 (19.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.1 | RB30 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.5 | RB41 (7.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.5 | RB41 (5.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.7 | RB41 (5.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.6 | RB48 (5.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.9 | RB30 (8.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.2 | RB16 (15.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.8 | RB42 (4.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 4.1 | RB22 (10.0) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade