
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup



vs IND: allows 15.1 PPR/g to TE, rank 7/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Patrick Mahomes. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (148/473). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE11), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 6 | 3 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 20% | 4.2 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 6 | 5 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 30% | 8.6 | 6.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 18% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 9 | 7 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 30% | 14.0 | 10.5 | 7.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 17% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 6 | 5 | 45 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 19% | 15.5 | 13.0 | 10.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 88% | 14% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 13 | 9 | 91 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 30% | 24.1 | 19.6 | 15.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 5 | 4 | 66 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 17% | 12.6 | 10.6 | 8.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 8 | 6 | 99 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 25% | 21.9 | 18.9 | 15.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 3 | 3 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 9% | 8.4 | 6.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 7 | 6 | 78 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 25% | 13.8 | 10.8 | 7.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 8 | 7 | 61 | 1 | – | – | 80% | 20% | 19.1 | 15.6 | 12.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 5 | 5 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 14% | 9.8 | 7.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 7 | 4 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 20% | 6.6 | 4.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 6 | 4 | 61 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 21% | 10.1 | 8.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 4 | 2 | 47 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 11% | 12.7 | 11.7 | 10.7 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 11 | 8 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 29% | 22.4 | 18.4 | 14.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 10.3 | TE36 (4.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 9.9 | TE19 (8.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 10.5 | TE53 (1.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 11.3 | TE10 (14.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 11.8 | TE47 (1.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 12.7 | TE4 (15.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 12.0 | TE15 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 10.6 | TE3 (24.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 11.2 | TE8 (12.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 9.8 | TE2 (21.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade