
Why: high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (364/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR3), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W17 | @ | 8 | 5 | 118 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 18.7 | 16.2 | 13.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Wide receiver Puka Nacua (hip flexor) and offensive lineman Keagen Trost (hamstring) also did not practice on Tuesday.
source ↗The Los Angeles Rams do not expect wide receiver Puka Nacua and left tackle Alaric Jackson to be suspended for Thursday's season opener against the San Francisco 49ers despite ongoing legal situations, head coach Sean McVay said Sunday.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 9 | 5 | 74 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 33% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 11 | 10 | 76 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 69% | 30% | 26.0 | 21.0 | 16.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 5 | 47 | 1 | – | – | 74% | 28% | 15.7 | 13.2 | 10.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 16 | 12 | 225 | 2 | – | – | 78% | 33% | 46.5 | 40.5 | 34.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 11 | 9 | 181 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 56% | 29% | 27.9 | 23.4 | 18.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 11 | 7 | 167 | 2 | – | – | 44% | 36% | 35.7 | 32.2 | 28.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 9 | 6 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 33% | 13.2 | 10.2 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 11 | 7 | 97 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 32% | 16.7 | 13.2 | 9.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 8 | 7 | 75 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 67% | 30% | 14.3 | 10.8 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 6 | 5 | 64 | 1 | – | – | 52% | 18% | 17.4 | 14.9 | 12.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 8 | 7 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 49% | 26% | 22.8 | 19.3 | 15.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 12% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 12 | 10 | 85 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 26% | 24.5 | 19.5 | 14.5 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 15 | 13 | 170 | 1 | – | – | 81% | 38% | 36.0 | 29.5 | 23.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 15 | 11 | 112 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 91% | 46% | 22.8 | 17.3 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 9 | 8 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 69% | 28% | 27.6 | 23.6 | 19.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 11 | 10 | 130 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 63% | 39% | 23.1 | 18.1 | 13.1 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 14 | 10 | 129 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 50% | 22.9 | 17.9 | 12.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 27 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 20.3 | WR3 (26.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 19.9 | WR13 (15.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 16.7 | WR1 (46.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 16.8 | WR2 (27.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.4 | WR2 (35.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 14.4 | WR23 (13.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 12.0 | WR14 (16.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 12.7 | WR17 (14.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.8 | WR15 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 17.7 | WR5 (22.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade