Loading…
Puka Nacua
WR · LAR
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: high-scoring game
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
26.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs SF: allows 32.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 13/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs SF
contextvs SF: 5 games, 20.8 PPR avg
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %69%
Target share30%
Opportunities13
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
99Average
#18 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
105Easy
#9 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
99Average
#18 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Fantasy Football Rankings: Superflex top 200 for draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- Ranking the NFL’s highest-graded players in primetimewww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- 2026 Fantasy Football Rankings: PPR top 250 for draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-27
- Despite no second contract, Puka Nacua apparently won't be holding inwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-26
- NFL Trade Rumors Top 100 Players: Full 2026 List, A Correction & The Next Best 10nfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs ARI | 11 | 10 | 76 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 69% | 30% | 26.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ ATL | 10 | 5 | 47 | 1 | – | – | 74% | 28% | 15.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ SEA | 16 | 12 | 225 | 2 | – | – | 78% | 33% | 46.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs DET | 11 | 9 | 181 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 56% | 29% | 27.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @ARI | 11 | 7 | 167 | 2 | – | – | 44% | 36% | 35.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ CAR | 9 | 6 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 33% | 13.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs TB | 11 | 7 | 97 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 32% | 16.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vsSEA | 8 | 7 | 75 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 67% | 30% | 14.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ SF | 6 | 5 | 64 | 1 | – | – | 52% | 18% | 17.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs NO | 8 | 7 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 49% | 26% | 22.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ BAL | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 12% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vsSF | 12 | 10 | 85 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 26% | 24.5 |
| 2025 W4 | vs IND | 15 | 13 | 170 | 1 | – | – | 81% | 38% | 36.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ PHI | 15 | 11 | 112 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 91% | 46% | 22.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ TEN | 9 | 8 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 69% | 28% | 27.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs HOU | 11 | 10 | 130 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 63% | 39% | 23.1 |
| 2024 W17 | vsARI | 14 | 10 | 129 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 50% | 22.9 |
| 2024 W16 | @ NYJ | 9 | 8 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 47% | 13.6 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim82%hit rate
27 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 86%
of 22 Start calls
🟡 75%
of 4 Flex calls
🔴 0%
of 1 Sit call
Based on 27 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | ARI | START | 20.3 | WR3 (26.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | ATL | START | 19.9 | WR13 (15.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | SEA | START | 16.7 | WR1 (46.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | DET | START | 16.8 | WR2 (27.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | ARI | START | 14.4 | WR2 (35.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | CAR | START | 14.4 | WR23 (13.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | TB | FLEX | 12.0 | WR14 (16.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | SEA | FLEX | 12.7 | WR17 (14.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | SF | START | 15.8 | WR15 (17.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | NO | START | 17.7 | WR5 (22.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade