Loading…
Payne Durham
TE · TB
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
24.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs CIN: allows 20.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs CIN
contextNo prior games vs CIN in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %27%
Target share5%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
87Hard
#28 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Bucs tight end Devin Culp good to go for training camp after missing minicamp with injurywww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-28
- SR’s FAB 5: Bucs’ 20 Critical Camp Questionswww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-24
- Queipo’s Cover 4: Finding A Vet CB For The Bucs, Chris Godwin Jr. Dilemmawww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-22
- Projecting The Bucs’ Way-Too-Early 2027 Roster Needs: Offensewww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-21
- Bucs MVDPs: Tampa Bay’s Most Valuable Depth Playerswww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-20
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs CAR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @CAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs ARI | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 43% | 4% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs NE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 2% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ HOU | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vsNO | 2 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 81% | 7% | 9.6 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 33 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CAR | SIT | 0.9 | TE84 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | MIA | SIT | 1.7 | TE84 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | CAR | SIT | 1.5 | TE90 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | ATL | SIT | 1.2 | TE89 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | NO | SIT | 1.3 | TE79 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | ARI | SIT | 1.1 | TE48 (2.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | LAR | SIT | 1.3 | TE79 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | BUF | SIT | 1.2 | TE80 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | NE | SIT | 1.3 | TE75 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NO | SIT | 0.9 | TE72 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade