
Why: projected outside startable range
vs ATL: allows 33.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bryce Young. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (274/464). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR36), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
"Stuff like that can get you benched and sidelined and stuff like that, so I just can't do stuff like that." In a way, it has, since Jalen Coker has surpassed him as the secondary target to reigning offensive rookie of the year Tetairoa McM
source ↗"Stuff like that can get you benched and sidelined and stuff like that, so I just can't do stuff like that." In a way, it has, since Jalen Coker has surpassed him as the secondary target to reigning offensive rookie of the year Tetairoa McM
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 9 | 8 | 138 | 2 | 0% | 27% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 7 | 6 | 47 | 1 | 92% | 23% | 16.7 | 13.7 | 10.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 72% | 10% | 3.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 81% | 16% | 7.7 | 6.2 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 4 | 60 | 1 | 68% | 20% | 14.0 | 12.0 | 10.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 6 | 4 | 74 | 1 | 55% | 30% | 17.4 | 15.4 | 13.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 4 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 83% | 15% | 6.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 68% | 9% | 11.2 | 9.2 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 75% | 17% | 5.1 | 3.6 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 66% | 5% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 4 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 66% | 17% | 6.6 | 5.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 7 | 7 | 62 | 0 | 93% | 20% | 14.0 | 10.5 | 7.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 87% | 9% | 5.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 5 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 82% | 21% | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 6 | 4 | 110 | 1 | 87% | 22% | 21.0 | 19.0 | 17.0 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 8 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 88% | 32% | 7.1 | 5.6 | 4.1 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 36 | 0 | 45% | 13% | 5.6 | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 20 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 9.2 | WR12 (16.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 9.6 | WR80 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 9.7 | WR52 (7.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 9.2 | WR25 (14.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.5 | WR15 (17.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.8 | WR48 (6.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.4 | WR25 (11.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.7 | WR58 (5.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.7 | WR81 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.3 | WR54 (6.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade