Loading…
David Njoku
TE · LAC
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
28.4
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs ARI: allows 16.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs ARI
contextvs ARI: 1 game, 12.6 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W9 |  CLE· prior | vs ARI | 6 | 4 | 26 | 1 | 12.6 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %9%
Target share3%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#24 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
107Average
#11 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#24 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- Get ready for NFL training camps: We have the leag...www.espn.com · 2026-07-21
- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For TE Jonnu Smithnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-20
- Which players dropped out of the NFL top-10 rankin...www.espn.com · 2026-07-17
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W14 | vs TEN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9% | 3% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs SF | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 51% | 9% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs BAL | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 65% | 8% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ NYJ | 2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 68% | 6% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W8 | @ NE | 5 | 4 | 37 | 1 | 59% | 15% | 13.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ PIT | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 44% | 12% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIN | 9 | 6 | 67 | 1 | 96% | 28% | 18.7 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DET | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 84% | 9% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs GB | 7 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 76% | 22% | 9.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @BAL | 5 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 82% | 12% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs CIN | 6 | 3 | 37 | 0 | 84% | 14% | 6.7 |
| 2024 W16 | @CIN | 10 | 8 | 66 | 0 | 62% | 32% | 14.6 |
| 2024 W14 | @PIT | 13 | 7 | 42 | 1 | 90% | 35% | 17.2 |
| 2024 W13 | @ DEN | 17 | 9 | 52 | 2 | 92% | 30% | 26.2 |
| 2024 W12 | vsPIT | 5 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 98% | 19% | 3.9 |
| 2024 W11 | @ NO | 9 | 9 | 81 | 0 | 86% | 20% | 19.1 |
| 2024 W9 | vs LAC | 7 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 77% | 15% | 7.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim52%hit rate
23 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 40%
of 10 Start calls
🟡 56%
of 9 Flex calls
🔴 75%
of 4 Sit calls
Based on 23 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W14 | TEN | SIT | 3.7 | TE18 (7.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | SF | SIT | 4.8 | TE45 (2.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | LV | SIT | 6.1 | TE63 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | BAL | FLEX | 8.7 | TE47 (1.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | NYJ | FLEX | 8.8 | TE11 (10.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NE | FLEX | 9.1 | TE9 (13.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | PIT | FLEX | 9.5 | TE29 (5.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W5 | MIN | SIT | 7.8 | TE7 (18.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W4 | DET | FLEX | 9.8 | TE38 (3.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W3 | GB | START | 11.5 | TE15 (9.0) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade