
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup
vs NYJ: allows 27.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Taylor would give McCarthy the bell-cow back he’s missed since Ezekiel Elliott’s decline and Tony Pollard’s fibula injury in the 2022 postseason while coaching the Cowboys.” This assessment underscores how Taylor might fit seamlessly into t
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 14 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 63% | 9% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 18 | 85 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 50% | 6% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 21 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55% | 0% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 14 | 104 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 53% | 8% | 18.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 25 | 161 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59% | 0% | 28.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 10 | 60 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 46% | 6% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 11 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 51% | 13% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 10 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 49% | 8% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 10 | 56 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 62% | 10% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 11 | 44 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 46% | 5% | 6.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 18 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 43 | 0 | 57% | 19% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 10 | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 43% | 6% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 14 | 67 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 73% | 8% | 14.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 14 | 64 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 86% | 13% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 16 | 45 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 91% | 12% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 20 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89% | 3% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 18 | 60 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 89% | 4% | 7.9 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 22 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73% | 0% | 6.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 13.4 | RB23 (9.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.8 | RB18 (11.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.9 | RB28 (10.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 10.6 | RB11 (18.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.0 | RB2 (28.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.9 | RB50 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.7 | RB31 (8.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.7 | RB43 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 10.1 | RB27 (7.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 11.5 | RB34 (6.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade