
Why: low total
vs LAC: allows 26.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 | vs | 6 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 5.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 51% | 10% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 7 | 6 | 69 | 0 | 61% | 19% | 12.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 12 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 91% | 27% | 14.3 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 10 | 7 | 96 | 1 | 72% | 35% | 22.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 2 | 58 | 0 | 86% | 18% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 2 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 23% | 5% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 5 | 4 | 98 | 0 | 76% | 17% | 13.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 10 | 6 | 66 | 1 | 100% | 25% | 18.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 3 | 44 | 0 | 80% | 18% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 5 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 93% | 20% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 6 | 5 | 71 | 1 | 89% | 21% | 18.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 5 | 63 | 1 | 74% | 19% | 17.3 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 10 | 6 | 96 | 0 | 84% | 22% | 15.6 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 8 | 4 | 39 | 0 | 81% | 28% | 7.9 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 6 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 77% | 19% | 5.2 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 8 | 4 | 49 | 0 | 85% | 21% | 8.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 12 | 5 | 60 | 1 | 88% | 28% | 17.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 27 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.0 | WR147 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 13.2 | WR94 (2.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.2 | WR24 (12.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.8 | WR23 (14.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 10.1 | WR6 (22.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 9.4 | WR47 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | FLEX | 10.7 | WR63 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | FLEX | 12.0 | WR23 (13.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 10.7 | WR14 (18.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 11.8 | WR53 (7.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade