
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs TEN: allows 35.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jalen Hurts. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (290/463). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR64), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W3 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
But the team had been preparing for this trade: It drafted Makai Lemon in the first round of this year's draft and traded for Dontayvion Wicks.
source ↗But the team had been preparing for this trade: It drafted Makai Lemon in the first round of this year's draft and traded for Dontayvion Wicks.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 4 | 2 | 73 | 1 | – | – | 0% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 4% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 8% | 3.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 6% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 11% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 7 | 6 | 94 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 49% | 24% | 28.0 | 25.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 4 | 2 | 32 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 19% | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 8% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 8 | 4 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 24% | 7.8 | 5.8 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 27% | 7% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 8% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 11% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 4 | 2 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 16% | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 22% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 9% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 5 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 24% | 9.9 | 7.4 | 4.9 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 5 | 4 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 17% | 8.3 | 6.3 | 4.3 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 7 | 3 | 13 | 1 | – | – | 61% | 26% | 10.3 | 8.8 | 7.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 5.7 | WR103 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.6 | WR86 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.8 | WR97 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 9.8 | WR131 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.5 | WR3 (28.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.8 | WR54 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.5 | WR90 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.4 | WR41 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 7.2 | WR98 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 7.9 | WR78 (3.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade