Loading…
Tee Higgins
WR · CIN
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 2
Why: soft matchup
2026 Wk 2
Reads
analysis
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
–
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs HOU: allows 25.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 31/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
CIN targets to WR
CIN routes 61% of pass targets to WR this season (58% over the trailing 8 wk), +0.2 SD vs the league WR average.
Primary passer Joe Burrow. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (367/605). Descriptive context, never a model input.
Draft outlook
contextProj15.7WR9
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR9), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
History vs HOU
contextNo prior games vs HOU in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %0%
Target share18%
Opportunities6
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
102Average
#12 of 32 · 16 games
Fantasy playoffs
106Easy
#7 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
102Average
#11 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
contextrole changesnaps ↑
For example, the Cincinnati Bengals are looking to secure their third receiving option behind Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, while the Cleveland Browns, Atlanta Falcons and Minnesota Vikings are all still trying to decide which quarterback
source ↗role changesnaps ↑
For example, the Cincinnati Bengals are looking to secure their third receiving option behind Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, while the Cleveland Browns, Atlanta Falcons and Minnesota Vikings are all still trying to decide which quarterback
source ↗- Let's kick off NFL Week 2: Seven things Solak thinks -- including that Houston's offense could be decentwww.espn.com · 2026-09-15
- Did This Bucs Weakness Become A Strength?www.pewterreport.com · 2026-09-15
- PR Roundtable: One Thing Bucs Should Worry About After Week 1www.pewterreport.com · 2026-09-15
- Waiver wire: Shough, Black, Coker highlight top picks for Week 2www.espn.com · 2026-09-14
- Waiver wire: Shough, Black, Coker highlight top picks for Week 2www.espn.com · 2026-09-14
Game log
context2025 by week
Fantasy points, matchups, and our calls
14.1 PPR/g · best 33.1
6
✗
1
15
✗
2
3
✓
3
6
✓
4
11
✓
5
11
✓
6
22
✗
7
11
✗
8
33
✓
9
15
✓
11
8
✗
12
27
✓
14
14
✓
16
10
✗
17
19
✓
18
Fantasy playoffs · W15–1712.1 PPR/g over 2 gamesbelow their 14.1 season averageour calls: 1/2 hit
Our weekly call: Start Flex Sit✓ hit ✗ miss playoff weeks
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs TB | 6 | 3 | 59 | 0 | 0% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vsCLE | 9 | 6 | 67 | 1 | 87% | 24% | 18.7 | 15.7 | 12.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vsARI | 5 | 4 | 59 | 0 | 57% | 16% | 9.9 | 7.9 | 5.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @MIA | 3 | 3 | 53 | 1 | 62% | 10% | 14.3 | 12.8 | 11.3 |
| 2025 W14 | @BUF | 11 | 6 | 92 | 2 | 73% | 31% | 27.2 | 24.2 | 21.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vsNE | 6 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 77% | 18% | 8.1 | 5.6 | 3.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @PIT | 8 | 3 | 63 | 1 | 92% | 21% | 15.3 | 13.8 | 12.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vsCHI | 9 | 7 | 121 | 2 | 82% | 20% | 33.1 | 29.6 | 26.1 |
| 2025 W8 | vsNYJ | 2 | 1 | 44 | 1 | 88% | 6% | 11.4 | 10.9 | 10.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vsPIT | 10 | 6 | 96 | 1 | 87% | 22% | 21.6 | 18.6 | 15.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @GB | 8 | 5 | 62 | 0 | 80% | 20% | 11.2 | 8.7 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vsDET | 7 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 97% | 18% | 11.2 | 9.7 | 8.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @DEN | 6 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 83% | 27% | 6.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @MIN | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 82% | 8% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W2 | vsJAX | 8 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 87% | 19% | 14.6 | 13.1 | 11.6 |
| 2025 W1 | @CLE | 4 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 79% | 17% | 6.3 | 4.8 | 3.3 |
| 2024 W18 | @PIT | 5 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 68% | 11% | 9.3 | 7.3 | 5.3 |
| 2024 W17 | vsDEN | 12 | 11 | 131 | 3 | 69% | 25% | 40.1 | 34.6 | 29.1 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Accuracy
our claim56%hit rate
27 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 67%
of 9 Start calls
🟡 42%
of 12 Flex calls
🔴 67%
of 6 Sit calls
Based on 27 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CLE | FLEX | 11.7 | WR8 (18.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | ARI | FLEX | 13.0 | WR35 (9.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | MIA | START | 14.8 | WR21 (14.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | BUF | FLEX | 12.1 | WR4 (27.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | NE | FLEX | 13.2 | WR40 (8.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | PIT | START | 12.9 | WR15 (15.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CHI | FLEX | 11.6 | WR2 (33.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NYJ | FLEX | 12.3 | WR33 (11.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W7 | PIT | SIT | 9.4 | WR13 (21.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W6 | GB | SIT | 9.1 | WR28 (11.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade