
Why: low total




vs TB: allows 31.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Shedeur Sanders. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (231/519). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR65), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs TB in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 4 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 88% | 29% | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 7 | 5 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 30% | 10.4 | 7.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 4 | 3 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 15% | 4.2 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 13% | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 3 | 76 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 13% | 16.6 | 15.1 | 13.6 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 3 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 17% | 5.6 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 3 | 1 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 7 | 3 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 28% | 5.1 | 3.6 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 12 | 6 | 78 | 1 | – | – | 96% | 38% | 19.8 | 16.8 | 13.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 4 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 22% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 13 | 5 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 26% | 9.3 | 6.8 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 16% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 9 | 3 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 27% | 7.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 5 | 1 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 16% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 8 | 4 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 20% | 9.1 | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 8 | 5 | 66 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 19% | 11.6 | 9.1 | 6.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 9.3 | WR65 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.8 | WR33 (10.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.6 | WR79 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.4 | WR74 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.6 | WR14 (16.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 9.2 | WR60 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 9.7 | WR75 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 10.4 | WR60 (5.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.2 | WR11 (19.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 9.8 | WR107 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade