Loading…
Ray Davis
RB · BUF
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
23.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs HOU: allows 19.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 23/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs HOU
contextvs HOU: 2 games, 0.7 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %64%
Target share7%
Opportunities23
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
99Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
95Hard
#27 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
99Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For RB Nick Chubbnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- Mock draft: 12-team league can shift your quarterb...www.espn.com · 2026-07-13
- Fantasy football: Players to upgrade, downgrade du...www.espn.com · 2026-07-10
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs NYJ | 21 | 151 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 64% | 7% | 25.4 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PHI | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 13% | 3% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W16 | @ CLE | 3 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 16% | 11% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ NE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 9% | 4% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W14 | vs CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ PIT | 9 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 6.2 |
| 2025 W12 | @ HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs TB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ MIA | 2 | -2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 5% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W9 | vs KC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ CAR | 9 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 4% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 4% | 8% | 9.9 |
| 2025 W5 | vsNE | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs NO | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W3 | vsMIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @NYJ | 9 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs BAL | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12% | 2% | 1.1 |
| 2024 W18 | @NE | 15 | 64 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 52% | 10% | 14.5 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim75%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 77%
of 31 Sit calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NYJ | SIT | 3.6 | RB3 (25.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | PHI | SIT | 3.5 | RB58 (2.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | CLE | SIT | 2.9 | RB48 (5.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | NE | SIT | 2.7 | RB60 (2.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | CIN | SIT | 3.9 | RB81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | PIT | SIT | 1.5 | RB44 (6.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | HOU | SIT | 2.3 | RB75 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | TB | SIT | 3.5 | RB86 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | MIA | SIT | 4.0 | RB59 (0.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | KC | SIT | 3.3 | RB77 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade