Loading…
vs KC: allows 27.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bo Nix. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (348/570). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR17), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
But the Broncos traded for Jaylen Waddle to play opposite Courtland Sutton, so that's a crowded wide receivers room for new playcaller Davis Webb.
source ↗At this point, it’s still unclear whether or not the Broncos will have receiver Jaylen Waddle for Sunday’s game against the Chiefs. Jaylen Waddle questionable, RJ Harvey ruled out for Broncos-Chiefs
source ↗
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @ARI | 7 | 4 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 28% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | vsSEA | 7 | 4 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 29% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @LAC | 5 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 65% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @SF | 6 | 5 | 35 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 16% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vsLAR | 7 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 73% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vsJAX | 10 | 8 | 138 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 36% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @KC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 11% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs TB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 25% | 5% | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs CIN | 9 | 5 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 32% | 12.2 | 9.7 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ PIT | 4 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 16% | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ NYJ | 7 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 78% | 33% | 18.1 | 15.6 | 13.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs NO | 6 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 30% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs WSH | 7 | 3 | 52 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 35% | 8.2 | 6.7 | 5.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs BUF | 7 | 5 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 33% | 19.4 | 16.9 | 14.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs BAL | 9 | 6 | 82 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 24% | 14.2 | 11.2 | 8.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ ATL | 6 | 5 | 99 | 1 | – | – | 78% | 23% | 20.9 | 18.4 | 15.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ CLE | 4 | 1 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vsLAC | 8 | 6 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 28% | 15.8 | 12.8 | 9.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.