
Why: projected outside startable range



vs JAX: allows 31.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bo Nix. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (348/570). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR17), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W1 | vs | 5 | 5 | 109 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 16.2 | 13.7 | 11.2 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
But the Broncos traded for Jaylen Waddle to play opposite Courtland Sutton, so that's a crowded wide receivers room for new playcaller Davis Webb.
source ↗The Broncos traded for wide receiver Jaylen Waddle, and Payton relinquished primary playcalling duties to newly promoted offensive coordinator Davis Webb.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 25% | 5% | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 5 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 32% | 12.2 | 9.7 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 16% | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 7 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 78% | 33% | 18.1 | 15.6 | 13.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 6 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 30% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 7 | 3 | 52 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 35% | 8.2 | 6.7 | 5.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 7 | 5 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 33% | 19.4 | 16.9 | 14.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 9 | 6 | 82 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 24% | 14.2 | 11.2 | 8.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 6 | 5 | 99 | 1 | – | – | 78% | 23% | 20.9 | 18.4 | 15.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 4 | 1 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 8 | 6 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 28% | 15.8 | 12.8 | 9.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 9 | 6 | 110 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 27% | 23.0 | 20.0 | 17.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 3 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 24% | 7.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 5 | 39 | 1 | – | – | 87% | 18% | 14.9 | 12.4 | 9.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 6 | 5 | 68 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 20% | 17.8 | 15.3 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 5 | 4 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 17% | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 9 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 90% | 26% | 9.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 11.7 | WR117 (0.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.8 | WR28 (12.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 13.4 | WR71 (4.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 13.1 | WR11 (18.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 13.8 | WR49 (7.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 12.5 | WR41 (8.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 11.7 | WR13 (19.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 12.6 | WR25 (14.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 11.4 | WR5 (20.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 12.4 | WR88 (2.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade