
vs ATL: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Baker Mayfield. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (91/537). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB16), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
He is being drafted ahead of backs like Bucky Irving, Quinshon Judkins and D'Andre Swift, who are either in better offenses with more assured volume or hold outright workhorse roles.
source ↗It’s no secret that Gainwell hasn’t been very productive thus far in his Bucs career despite all the money he’s making, but with no Sean Tucker available, that made Bucky Irving the bell cow of the group at a whopping 85%.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @ | 24 | 106 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 59% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | vs | 19 | 46 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 85% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 21 | 165 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 54% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 16 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 15 | 46 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 52% | 11% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 17 | 89 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 78% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 8 | 45 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 61% | 26% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 26 | 85 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 63% | 9% | 10.8 | 10.3 | 9.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 9 | 19 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 54% | 14% | 8.3 | 5.8 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 19 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 0% | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 16 | 60 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 54% | 9% | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 15 | 55 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 26 | 1 | 49% | 11% | 16.1 | 15.1 | 14.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 17 | 61 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 52% | 8% | 16.1 | 15.1 | 14.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 15 | 63 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 102 | 1 | 61% | 13% | 25.5 | 23.0 | 20.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 25 | 66 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 74% | 14% | 13.9 | 11.9 | 9.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 17 | 71 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 50 | 0 | 71% | 17% | 18.1 | 15.1 | 12.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 14 | 37 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 76% | 13% | 14.5 | 12.5 | 10.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 19 | 89 | 1 | 5 | 2 | -5 | 0 | 72% | 16% | 16.4 | 15.4 | 14.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.