
Why: projected outside startable range
vs IND: allows 36.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W3 | vs | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.6 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 53% | 5% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69% | 10% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 86% | 9% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 61% | 7% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 4 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 71% | 17% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 4 | 2 | 51 | 0 | 79% | 18% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 56% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81% | 15% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 2 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 82% | 7% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 7 | 5 | 63 | 1 | 60% | 25% | 17.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 59% | 14% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 4 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 73% | 21% | 3.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 8 | 5 | 76 | 1 | 71% | 28% | 18.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 44% | 6% | 2.2 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 3 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 81% | 13% | 8.4 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 5 | 3 | 80 | 2 | 76% | 21% | 23.0 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.3 | WR102 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.3 | WR138 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 6.7 | WR60 (4.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.3 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 7.3 | WR60 (4.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.6 | WR41 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.0 | WR52 (7.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 7.3 | WR90 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 7.8 | WR117 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 10.7 | WR81 (3.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade