
vs TEN: allows 14.2 PPR/g to TE, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Joe Burrow. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (127/605). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE27), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | @ | 4 | 3 | 37 | 0 | 6.7 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Given the conversations I had at camp, I think the Bengals' tight end room will start out as a three-player unit between All, Mike Gesicki and Drew Sample.
source ↗Given the conversations I had at camp, I think the Bengals' tight end room will start out as a three-player unit between All, Mike Gesicki and Drew Sample.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @ | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 38% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 45% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 5 | 3 | 40 | 1 | 62% | 9% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @ | 3 | 3 | 37 | 1 | 51% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | vs | 7 | 5 | 78 | 1 | 33% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 38% | 5% | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 23% | 6% | 6.7 | 5.7 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 48% | 13% | 12.5 | 11.0 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 57% | 6% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 6 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 42% | 17% | 20.6 | 17.6 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 28% | 9% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 43% | 18% | 7.5 | 5.5 | 3.5 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 50% | 13% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 56% | 5% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 30% | 12% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 52% | 9% | 4.8 | 3.3 | 1.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.