Loading…
Ben Sinnott
TE · WSH
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
21.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs PHI: allows 8.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 31/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs PHI
contextvs PHI: 4 games, 0.9 PPR avg
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %55%
Target share11%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
100Average
#15 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
88Hard
#27 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
100Average
#15 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ PHI | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 55% | 11% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W17 | vs DAL | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 61% | 19% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vsPHI | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 69% | 10% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W15 | @ NYG | 1 | 1 | 36 | 0 | 57% | 6% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ MIN | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 25% | 5% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs DEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs DET | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39% | 5% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ KC | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 21% | 3% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W7 | @DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ GB | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 4% | 3% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W1 | vsNYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vsATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
31 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 31 Sit calls
Based on 31 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | PHI | SIT | 4.5 | TE44 (2.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | DAL | SIT | 2.8 | TE28 (5.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | PHI | SIT | 2.4 | TE57 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | NYG | SIT | 1.6 | TE34 (4.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | MIN | SIT | 1.6 | TE49 (1.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | DEN | SIT | 1.7 | TE99 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | DET | SIT | 0.9 | TE20 (7.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | SEA | SIT | 1.1 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | KC | SIT | 0.8 | TE36 (3.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | DAL | SIT | 1.2 | TE92 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade