
Why: limited usage, low total
vs LAC: allows 18.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W13 | vs | 8 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3.2 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 37% | 7% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 10 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 16 | 79 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 40% | 3% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 11 | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 39% | 7% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 8 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 25% | 7% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 12 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 39% | 5% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 3 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 21% | 7% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 11 | 57 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 17.7 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 0.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 40% | 7% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 4 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 10 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 10.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 16 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 11.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 5% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 16 | 76 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 33% | 5% | 15.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 10 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 9 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 22% | 5% | 8.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.0 | RB59 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.1 | RB60 (2.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.9 | RB37 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.4 | RB65 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.3 | RB31 (8.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.5 | RB20 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.3 | RB36 (5.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.5 | RB28 (9.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.1 | RB9 (17.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 7.2 | RB61 (0.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade