
Why: projected outside startable range
vs ARI: allows 16.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Sam Darnold. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (101/451). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE23), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Arroyo was a second-round pick by the Seahawks last season but ultimately lost the starting job to AJ Barner. - Seattle rested its starters and other key players, including quarterback Sam Darnold, running back George Holani, wide receivers
source ↗Arroyo was a second-round pick by the Seahawks last season but ultimately lost the starting job to AJ Barner. - Seattle rested its starters and other key players, including quarterback Sam Darnold, running back George Holani, wide receivers
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 9% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 12% | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 3 | 43 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 12% | 13.3 | 11.8 | 10.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 6 | 4 | 49 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 94% | 19% | 15.0 | 13.0 | 11.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 6 | 3 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 19% | 5.7 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 13% | 5.7 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 5 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 85% | 22% | 7.7 | 5.7 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 16% | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 11 | 10 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 87% | 26% | 17.1 | 12.1 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 37% | 0% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 84% | 17% | 11.5 | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 86% | 10% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 3 | 71 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 13% | 10.1 | 8.6 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 7 | 7 | 53 | 2 | – | – | 80% | 21% | 24.3 | 20.8 | 17.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 3 | 3 | 32 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 13% | 12.2 | 10.7 | 9.2 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 5% | 3.3 | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 3 | 2 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 89% | 10% | 10.8 | 9.8 | 8.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 85% | 9% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 9.0 | TE38 (3.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 9.5 | TE10 (13.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.4 | TE8 (15.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 10.0 | TE26 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 8.5 | TE22 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.5 | TE22 (7.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.1 | TE35 (3.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.4 | TE4 (17.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE53 (0.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 8.9 | TE13 (11.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade