
Why: limited usage
vs ATL: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bryce Young. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (92/464). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB31), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Chuba Hubbard’s injury could accelerate that timeline, as he is expected to miss the rest of training camp, giving Brooks an extended opportunity to work with the first-team offense.
source ↗Chuba Hubbard’s injury could accelerate that timeline, as he is expected to miss the rest of training camp, giving Brooks an extended opportunity to work with the first-team offense.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 10 | 49 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 1 | 0% | 9% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 5 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 45% | 7% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 4 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 38% | 14% | 2.8 | 1.3 | -0.2 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 6 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 41% | 3% | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 42% | 5% | 4.8 | 4.3 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 17 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 1 | 59% | 10% | 20.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 3 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 35% | 15% | 8.3 | 6.3 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 19% | 7% | 3.8 | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 3 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 21% | 4% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 5 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 5% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 12 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 4% | 9.4 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 14 | 31 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 54% | 10% | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 10 | 49 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 51% | 9% | 9.9 | 8.4 | 6.9 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 17 | 73 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 62% | 13% | 9.6 | 8.6 | 7.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 10 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 74% | 11% | 18.7 | 16.2 | 13.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 16 | 57 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 67% | 15% | 17.9 | 16.4 | 14.9 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 25 | 152 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 84% | 21% | 32.5 | 30.5 | 28.5 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 10 | 32 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 95% | 15% | 8.9 | 6.9 | 4.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.4 | RB54 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 8.7 | RB56 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.4 | RB52 (4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.9 | RB47 (4.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.0 | RB5 (20.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.6 | RB29 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.6 | RB49 (3.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 8.8 | RB50 (2.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 9.8 | RB55 (1.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 12.0 | RB26 (9.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade