
Why: low total
vs TEN: allows 35.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 15% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 9 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 29% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 6 | 3 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 18% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 9 | 6 | 58 | 1 | 1 | -4 | 79% | 29% | 17.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 6 | 1 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 19% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 12 | 8 | 102 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 39% | 24.2 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 7 | 2 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 27% | 6.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 6 | 1 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 23% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 5% | 2% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 17% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 4 | 3 | 96 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 13% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 8% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 12% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 21% | 7% | 4.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 21% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 11% | 4.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 10.3 | WR144 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.4 | WR62 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.9 | WR54 (7.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 10.8 | WR14 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 9.5 | WR72 (3.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.9 | WR6 (24.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.4 | WR47 (6.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 0.7 | WR89 (2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 4.0 | WR86 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 4.8 | WR127 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade