




vs SEA: allows 26.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Caleb Williams. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (313/529). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR33), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W17 | vs | 4 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
He was out there grinding and working and getting his body healthy so he could come back and be the star that he is." Receiver Rome Odunze played with Gordon at Washington and still gets caught by surprise by his teammate.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vs | 5 | 4 | 69 | 0 | 94% | 17% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @ | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 96% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 9 | 3 | 40 | 0 | 99% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 7 | 6 | 94 | 0 | 89% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 6 | 3 | 44 | 0 | 85% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 4 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 84% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 3 | 2 | 52 | 0 | 48% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 80% | 19% | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 3 | 53 | 0 | 78% | 30% | 8.3 | 6.8 | 5.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 6 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 76% | 21% | 6.1 | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 10 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 78% | 28% | 20.6 | 17.6 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 10 | 7 | 114 | 0 | 94% | 29% | 18.4 | 14.9 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 94% | 24% | 5.1 | 4.1 | 3.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 5 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 97% | 17% | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 4 | 69 | 1 | 76% | 22% | 16.9 | 14.9 | 12.9 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 7 | 3 | 62 | 1 | 90% | 25% | 15.2 | 13.7 | 12.2 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 11 | 7 | 128 | 2 | 100% | 33% | 31.8 | 28.3 | 24.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.