
Why: limited usage
vs NYJ: allows 27.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | vs | 6 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 5.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 18 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 46% | 21% | 9.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 53% | 6% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 13 | 52 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 53 | 0 | 47% | 19% | 21.5 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 3 | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 42% | 8% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 8 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 42% | 16% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | -1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 47% | 17% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 43% | 13% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 53% | 14% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 7 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 45% | 14% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 59 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 52% | 8% | 17.2 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 5 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 43% | 13% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 5 | 31 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 59% | 12% | 9.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 1.4 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 20 | 95 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 65% | 13% | 13.3 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 10 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 61% | 12% | 21.6 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 4 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 87 | 1 | 56% | 19% | 27.2 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 6 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 38% | 6% | 3.3 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 0.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.5 | RB22 (9.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 9.2 | RB67 (1.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.0 | RB12 (21.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.7 | RB45 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 7.6 | RB37 (6.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 9.4 | RB41 (8.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.9 | RB35 (6.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 9.1 | RB34 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.1 | RB24 (9.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 8.4 | RB13 (17.2) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade