
Why: projected outside startable range
vs LV: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Justin Herbert. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (371/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR35), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
(Rhim) - Chargers WR Quentin Johnston isn’t expected to miss much time, if any at all, after suffering an injury during the team’s joint practice with San Francisco on Tuesday.
source ↗(Rhim) - Chargers WR Quentin Johnston isn’t expected to miss much time, if any at all, after suffering an injury during the team’s joint practice with San Francisco on Tuesday.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 22% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 8 | 5 | 98 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 26% | 14.8 | 12.3 | 9.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 4 | 104 | 1 | – | – | 58% | 18% | 20.4 | 18.4 | 16.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 3 | 3 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 14% | 11.3 | 9.8 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 13% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 10 | 5 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 30% | 9.2 | 6.7 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 6 | 4 | 53 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 22% | 15.3 | 13.3 | 11.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 2 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 11% | 11.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 82% | 13% | 6.9 | 4.9 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 13 | 8 | 98 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 35% | 23.8 | 19.8 | 15.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 10 | 6 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 22% | 14.9 | 11.9 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 7 | 3 | 71 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 76% | 26% | 15.9 | 14.4 | 12.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 7 | 5 | 79 | 2 | – | – | 82% | 21% | 24.9 | 22.4 | 19.9 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 14 | 13 | 186 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 40% | 31.6 | 25.1 | 18.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 8 | 5 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 20% | 9.8 | 7.3 | 4.8 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 6 | 3 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 21% | 4.8 | 3.3 | 1.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.9 | WR17 (14.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.8 | WR11 (20.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 9.7 | WR80 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.5 | WR29 (11.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 9.2 | WR131 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.1 | WR38 (9.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 10.3 | WR23 (15.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 12.9 | WR119 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 13.9 | WR30 (11.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | START | 15.6 | WR62 (6.9) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade