
vs LAR: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Justin Herbert. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (371/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR35), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs LAR in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
(Rhim) - Chargers WR Quentin Johnston isn’t expected to miss much time, if any at all, after suffering an injury during the team’s joint practice with San Francisco on Tuesday.
source ↗(Rhim) - Chargers WR Quentin Johnston isn’t expected to miss much time, if any at all, after suffering an injury during the team’s joint practice with San Francisco on Tuesday.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W6 | @ | 3 | 1 | 57 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @ | 2 | 1 | 44 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 75% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @ | 6 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 5 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 81% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | vs | 6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 22% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 8 | 5 | 98 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 26% | 14.8 | 12.3 | 9.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 4 | 104 | 1 | – | – | 58% | 18% | 20.4 | 18.4 | 16.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 3 | 3 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 14% | 11.3 | 9.8 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 13% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 10 | 5 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 30% | 9.2 | 6.7 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 6 | 4 | 53 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 22% | 15.3 | 13.3 | 11.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 2 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 11% | 11.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 82% | 13% | 6.9 | 4.9 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 13 | 8 | 98 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 35% | 23.8 | 19.8 | 15.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 10 | 6 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 22% | 14.9 | 11.9 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 7 | 3 | 71 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 76% | 26% | 15.9 | 14.4 | 12.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.