
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYG: allows 11.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (150/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE32), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W4 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 77% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 4 | 36 | 2 | 84% | 19% | 19.6 | 17.6 | 15.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 7 | 6 | 53 | 0 | 78% | 19% | 11.3 | 8.3 | 5.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 86% | 8% | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 7 | 5 | 75 | 2 | 86% | 18% | 24.5 | 22.0 | 19.5 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 69% | 16% | 12.2 | 10.7 | 9.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 5 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 67% | 19% | 6.7 | 4.7 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 4 | 4 | 41 | 1 | 63% | 12% | 14.1 | 12.1 | 10.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 2 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 69% | 7% | 9.4 | 8.4 | 7.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 5 | 4 | 41 | 1 | 57% | 15% | 14.1 | 12.1 | 10.1 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 7% | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 3 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 47% | 9% | 7.7 | 6.2 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 2% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 28% | 5% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | -6 | 0 | 48% | 7% | -0.6 | -1.6 | -2.6 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 39% | 3% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 10.0 | TE4 (19.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 9.3 | TE12 (11.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 9.6 | TE36 (4.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.1 | TE5 (24.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.0 | TE11 (12.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.9 | TE25 (6.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.4 | TE5 (14.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.2 | TE11 (9.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.7 | TE8 (14.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 3.0 | TE40 (3.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade