
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs NO: allows 20.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W13 | @ | 8 | 60 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 6.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 19 | 80 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 71% | 14% | 20.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 17 | 41 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 69% | 10% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 7 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 66 | 1 | 86% | 25% | 22.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 13 | 38 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 81% | 18% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 12 | 43 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 69% | 23% | 37.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 20 | 68 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 70% | 15% | 11.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 15 | 219 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 45 | 1 | 74% | 32% | 55.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 12 | 39 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 107 | 0 | 73% | 22% | 19.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 15 | 142 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 50% | 13% | 38.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 9 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 66% | 8% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 17 | 136 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 82 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 36.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 17 | 65 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 69% | 7% | 7.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 12 | 54 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 52% | 9% | 16.7 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 15 | 91 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 62% | 8% | 17.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 22 | 67 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 69% | 23% | 26.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 12 | 94 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 19.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 9 | 19 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 0 | 66% | 26% | 15.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 23 | 139 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 31 | 1 | 66% | 16% | 46.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 17.1 | RB5 (20.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 17.9 | RB36 (6.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 21.3 | RB10 (22.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 21.1 | RB28 (9.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 21.7 | RB1 (37.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 20.2 | RB25 (11.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 19.2 | RB1 (55.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 16.0 | RB10 (19.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.3 | RB3 (38.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 16.1 | RB36 (5.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade