
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup






vs BUF: allows 23.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 8/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jared Goff. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (132/374). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB1), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | vs | 8 | 31 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 83 | 1 | 28.4 | 25.9 | 23.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Via multiple reporters on the scene, running back Jahmyr Gibbs did not participate in Wednesday’s practice to open training camp. Jahmyr Gibbs did not practice Wednesday, likely holding in
source ↗Small’s departure comes after Isiah Pacheco was placed on injured reserve and leaves the team with Jahmyr Gibbs, Jacob Saylors, and Sione Vaki at running back.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 29 | 156 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 19 | 80 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 71% | 14% | 20.3 | 18.8 | 17.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 17 | 41 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 69% | 10% | 6.4 | 5.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 7 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 66 | 1 | 86% | 25% | 22.8 | 17.8 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 13 | 38 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 81% | 18% | 9.8 | 7.8 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 12 | 43 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 69% | 23% | 37.0 | 33.5 | 30.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 20 | 68 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 70% | 15% | 11.6 | 10.1 | 8.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 15 | 219 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 45 | 1 | 74% | 32% | 55.4 | 49.9 | 44.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 12 | 39 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 107 | 0 | 73% | 22% | 19.6 | 17.1 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 15 | 142 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 50% | 13% | 38.2 | 36.7 | 35.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 9 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 66% | 8% | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 17 | 136 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 82 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 36.8 | 35.3 | 33.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 17 | 65 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 69% | 7% | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 12 | 54 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 52% | 9% | 16.7 | 15.7 | 14.7 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 15 | 91 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 62% | 8% | 17.7 | 16.7 | 15.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 22 | 67 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 69% | 23% | 26.9 | 24.4 | 21.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 12 | 94 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 19.4 | 17.9 | 16.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 9 | 19 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 0 | 66% | 26% | 15.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 17.1 | RB5 (20.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 17.9 | RB36 (6.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 21.3 | RB10 (22.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 21.1 | RB28 (9.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 21.7 | RB1 (37.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 20.2 | RB25 (11.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 19.2 | RB1 (55.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 16.0 | RB10 (19.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.3 | RB3 (38.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 16.1 | RB36 (5.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade