




vs NYJ: allows 14.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Geno Smith. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (156/489). Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs NYJ in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
While Brock Bowers is expected to lead the team in targets, either Nailor or Tucker could emerge as a fantasy-relevant option if the Raiders’ offense exceeds expectations. Miscellaneous Notes - Cardinals star tight end Trey McBride and Raid
source ↗Consider Loveland to be a mid-to-back-end TE1 against a Patriots defense that has allowed only one tight end (Brock Bowers) to reach 8.0 fantasy points this season. Over/under: 58.2 (Highest) Win probability: Lions 60% (9th highest) Los Ang
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vs | 8 | 6 | 73 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | vs | 9 | 4 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 10 | 8 | 110 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 28% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 11 | 6 | 86 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @ | 14 | 10 | 116 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 45% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 5 | 33 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 23% | 14.3 | 11.8 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8 | 6 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 32% | 8.8 | 5.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 4 | 46 | 1 | – | – | 100% | 18% | 14.6 | 12.6 | 10.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 4 | 63 | 2 | – | – | 98% | 18% | 22.3 | 20.3 | 18.3 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 6 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 21% | 11.5 | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 12 | 7 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 31% | 14.2 | 10.7 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 83% | 12% | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 13 | 12 | 127 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 81% | 34% | 43.3 | 37.3 | 31.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 5 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 30% | 9.6 | 7.1 | 4.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 5 | 4 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 19% | 9.8 | 7.8 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 8 | 5 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 19% | 8.8 | 6.3 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 5 | 103 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 24% | 15.3 | 12.8 | 10.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 9 | 4 | 50 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 27% | 15.0 | 13.0 | 11.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.