
Why: OUT · INJ gate



vs LAC: allows 10.5 PPR/g to TE, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Geno Smith. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (156/489). Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
While Brock Bowers is expected to lead the team in targets, either Nailor or Tucker could emerge as a fantasy-relevant option if the Raiders’ offense exceeds expectations. Miscellaneous Notes - Cardinals star tight end Trey McBride and Raid
source ↗The Las Vegas Raiders believe there is a realistic chance that tight end Brock Bowers will miss only one game because of his knee injury and return for their Week 2 contest against the Los Angeles Chargers, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 5 | 33 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 23% | 14.3 | 11.8 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8 | 6 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 32% | 8.8 | 5.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 4 | 46 | 1 | – | – | 100% | 18% | 14.6 | 12.6 | 10.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 4 | 63 | 2 | – | – | 98% | 18% | 22.3 | 20.3 | 18.3 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 6 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 21% | 11.5 | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 12 | 7 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 31% | 14.2 | 10.7 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 83% | 12% | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 13 | 12 | 127 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 81% | 34% | 43.3 | 37.3 | 31.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 5 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 30% | 9.6 | 7.1 | 4.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 5 | 4 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 19% | 9.8 | 7.8 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 8 | 5 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 19% | 8.8 | 6.3 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 5 | 103 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 24% | 15.3 | 12.8 | 10.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 9 | 4 | 50 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 27% | 15.0 | 13.0 | 11.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 7 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 91% | 20% | 14.6 | 11.1 | 7.6 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 13 | 11 | 99 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 35% | 20.9 | 15.4 | 9.9 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 6 | 3 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 18% | 6.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 85% | 14% | 8.2 | 6.7 | 5.2 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 14 | 10 | 140 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 90% | 41% | 30.2 | 25.2 | 20.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 27 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | START | 11.6 | TE11 (14.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 12.1 | TE18 (8.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 11.4 | TE7 (14.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 13.6 | TE1 (22.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 13.7 | TE7 (11.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 12.4 | TE6 (14.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 13.1 | TE32 (3.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 10.6 | TE1 (43.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 11.2 | TE20 (9.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | START | 11.6 | TE13 (9.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade