
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup
vs MIA: allows 16.2 PPR/g to TE, rank 4/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W11 | @ | 16 | 13 | 126 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 31.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 5 | 33 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 23% | 14.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8 | 6 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 32% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 4 | 46 | 1 | – | – | 100% | 18% | 14.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 4 | 63 | 2 | – | – | 98% | 18% | 22.3 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 6 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 21% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 12 | 7 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 31% | 14.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 83% | 12% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 13 | 12 | 127 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 81% | 34% | 43.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 5 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 30% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 5 | 4 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 19% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 8 | 5 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 19% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 5 | 103 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 24% | 15.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 9 | 4 | 50 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 27% | 15.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 7 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 91% | 20% | 14.6 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 13 | 11 | 99 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 35% | 20.9 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 6 | 3 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 18% | 6.5 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 85% | 14% | 8.2 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 14 | 10 | 140 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 90% | 41% | 30.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 27 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | START | 11.6 | TE11 (14.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 12.1 | TE18 (8.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 11.4 | TE7 (14.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 13.6 | TE1 (22.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 13.7 | TE7 (11.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 12.4 | TE6 (14.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 13.1 | TE32 (3.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 10.6 | TE1 (43.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 11.2 | TE20 (9.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | START | 11.6 | TE13 (9.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade