
Why: heavy usage
vs NYJ: allows 30.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W8 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 1.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 14 | 11 | 113 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 48% | 22.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 6 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 98% | 46% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 10 | 5 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 99% | 28% | 16.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 8 | 7 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 33% | 10.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 14 | 9 | 156 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 83% | 41% | 30.6 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 9 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 31% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 11 | 6 | 62 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 34% | 12.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 11 | 9 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 34% | 13.6 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 3 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 18% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 12 | 6 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 36% | 15.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 7 | 6 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 97% | 27% | 20.4 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 7 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 95% | 18% | 8.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 5 | 3 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 25% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 1 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 10 | 8 | 142 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 25% | 28.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 6 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 25% | 11.5 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 11 | 10 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 39% | 14.3 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 6 | 5 | 71 | 1 | – | – | 64% | 27% | 18.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | START | 16.3 | WR6 (22.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.8 | WR70 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 16.4 | WR18 (16.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 16.4 | WR34 (10.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 13.1 | WR2 (30.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 13.9 | WR43 (7.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 14.0 | WR29 (12.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 13.0 | WR28 (13.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 12.7 | WR50 (7.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 10.0 | WR21 (15.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade