Loading…
vs CIN: allows 25.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Cam Ward. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (292/523). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR38), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W6 |  NYG· prior | vs CIN | 11 | 5 | 50 | 0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vsCLE | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @IND | 7 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 32% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vsHOU | 7 | 6 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 20% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @BAL | 5 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 67% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @NYG | 11 | 7 | 57 | 1 | – | – | 63% | 31% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vsPHI | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 6% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | vsNYJ | 6 | 5 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | @ LV | 14 | 11 | 113 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 48% | 22.3 | 16.8 | 11.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs MIN | 6 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 98% | 46% | 5.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W15 | vs WSH | 10 | 5 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 99% | 28% | 16.4 | 13.9 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ NE | 8 | 7 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 33% | 10.4 | 6.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ DET | 14 | 9 | 156 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 83% | 41% | 30.6 | 26.1 | 21.6 |
| 2025 W11 | vs GB | 9 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 31% | 7.6 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ CHI | 11 | 6 | 62 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 34% | 12.2 | 9.2 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs SF | 11 | 9 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 34% | 13.6 | 9.1 | 4.6 |
| 2025 W8 | @PHI | 4 | 3 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 18% | 7.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ DEN | 12 | 6 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 36% | 15.5 | 12.5 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vsPHI | 7 | 6 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 97% | 27% | 20.4 | 17.4 | 14.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
