
Why: OUT · INJ gate



vs NYJ: allows 27.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jordan Love. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (78/452). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W10 | vs | 27 | 116 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 12.7 | 11.7 | 10.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
As a fourth-round pick, the Raiders were willing to take a gamble on White regaining the abilities that made him a five-star recruit back in the day, but with a bell-cow back like Josh Jacobs in place, there was little pressure early on.
source ↗Packers running back Josh Jacobs will miss the first game of the season, and likely at least five more, after pleading no contest to misdemeanor charges of battery and criminal damage to property. Matt LaFleur defends Josh Jacobs: "I know t
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 12 | 36 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 39% | 8% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 12 | 73 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 55% | 8% | 23.2 | 22.2 | 21.2 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 72% | 9% | 17.2 | 16.2 | 15.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 17 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 54% | 3% | 10.1 | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 7 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 4% | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 21 | 74 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 74% | 18% | 19.7 | 17.2 | 14.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 17 | 87 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 58% | 14% | 20.0 | 18.0 | 16.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 13 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 53% | 9% | 13.5 | 12.0 | 10.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 13 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 55% | 4% | 18.8 | 18.3 | 17.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | 0 | 79% | 19% | 32.0 | 29.5 | 27.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 22 | 86 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 71 | 0 | 65% | 11% | 31.7 | 29.7 | 27.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 16 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 66% | 36% | 12.4 | 9.9 | 7.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 23 | 84 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78% | 0% | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 19 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 88% | 5% | 14.0 | 13.5 | 13.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 31% | 4% | 11.6 | 11.1 | 10.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 17 | 69 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 0% | 10.9 | 10.9 | 10.9 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 13 | 69 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 41% | 15% | 20.7 | 18.7 | 16.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.3 | RB66 (1.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB51 (4.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 12.4 | RB6 (23.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 12.9 | RB10 (17.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 12.4 | RB34 (10.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.6 | RB47 (4.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 16.1 | RB6 (19.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 18.8 | RB4 (20.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 18.1 | RB19 (13.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 18.9 | RB9 (18.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade