Loading…
Josh Jacobs
RB · GB
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: form-driven
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
23.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIN: allows 19.3 PPR/g to RB, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs MIN
contextvs MIN: 3 games, 9.9 PPR avg (1 as LV, 2 as GB)
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %28%
Target share4%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
101Average
#11 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#22 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
101Average
#11 of 32 · 17 games
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For RB Nick Chubbnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- Investigation Into Packers RB Josh Jacobs Remains Opennfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- Josh Jacobs investigation remains openwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-27
- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For RB Najee Harrisnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-23
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Late-round sleepers to target in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-21
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs BAL | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ CHI | 12 | 36 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 39% | 8% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ DEN | 12 | 73 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 55% | 8% | 23.2 |
| 2025 W14 | vsCHI | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 72% | 9% | 17.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ DET | 17 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 54% | 3% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ NYG | 7 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 4% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs PHI | 21 | 74 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 74% | 18% | 19.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs CAR | 17 | 87 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 58% | 14% | 20.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ PIT | 13 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 53% | 9% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ ARI | 13 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 55% | 4% | 18.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs CIN | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | 0 | 79% | 19% | 32.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DAL | 22 | 86 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 71 | 0 | 65% | 11% | 31.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ CLE | 16 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 66% | 36% | 12.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs WSH | 23 | 84 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78% | 0% | 14.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vsDET | 19 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 88% | 5% | 14.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vsCHI | 6 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 31% | 4% | 11.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ MIN | 17 | 69 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 0% | 10.9 |
| 2024 W16 | vs NO | 13 | 69 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 41% | 15% | 20.7 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim81%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 91%
of 21 Start calls
🟡 64%
of 11 Flex calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | BAL | FLEX | 12.3 | RB66 (1.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | CHI | FLEX | 12.1 | RB51 (4.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | DEN | FLEX | 12.4 | RB6 (23.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | CHI | FLEX | 12.9 | RB10 (17.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | DET | FLEX | 12.4 | RB34 (10.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | NYG | START | 15.6 | RB47 (4.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | PHI | START | 16.1 | RB6 (19.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CAR | START | 18.8 | RB4 (20.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | PIT | START | 18.1 | RB19 (13.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | ARI | START | 18.9 | RB9 (18.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade