
Why: limited usage
vs CHI: allows 35.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 3/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W5 | @ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 3.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 4% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 3 | 1 | 9 | 1 | – | – | 57% | 9% | 7.9 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 5% | 2.7 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 90% | 13% | 11.9 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 15% | 3.9 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 5 | 2 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 15% | 4.5 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 9 | 5 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 22% | 9.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 10 | 6 | 81 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 30% | 20.1 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 16% | 3.8 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 4 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 17% | 4.0 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 5 | 4 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 15% | 7.9 |
| 2024 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 2024 W5 | @ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 40% | 9% | 3.3 |
| 2024 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 21 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 2.7 | WR108 (1.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 2.4 | WR111 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W2 | SIT | 4.5 | WR121 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 6.2 | WR115 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 6.5 | WR58 (7.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 8.5 | WR94 (2.7) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W16 | SIT | 10.4 | WR36 (11.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W15 | SIT | 10.9 | WR71 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W14 | SIT | 10.0 | WR58 (4.5) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W13 | SIT | 9.8 | WR51 (9.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade