
Why: limited usage
vs DET: allows 19.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W13 | vs | 14 | 51 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 58 | 0 | 28.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14% | 5% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 22 | 83 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 63% | 12% | 14.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 6 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 59% | 13% | 0.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 6 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 51% | 4% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 11 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 84% | 10% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 10 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 63% | 19% | 12.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 8 | 27 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 56% | 19% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 15 | 70 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 73% | 20% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 18 | 42 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 74% | 5% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 21 | 99 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 86% | 18% | 16.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 11 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 79% | 5% | 13.7 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 58 | 1 | 45% | 17% | 17.0 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 17 | 44 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 35 | 0 | 72% | 16% | 12.9 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 23 | 112 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 86% | 18% | 15.9 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 16 | 67 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 73% | 14% | 12.9 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 17 | 55 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 54 | 0 | 81% | 29% | 15.9 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 29 | 155 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 60 | 0 | 77% | 33% | 27.5 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 10 | 67 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 55 | 0 | 55% | 30% | 18.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 10.4 | RB46 (3.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 9.8 | RB17 (14.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 9.8 | RB59 (0.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 12.0 | RB33 (6.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB36 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W6 | FLEX | 13.3 | RB14 (12.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | START | 14.6 | RB27 (9.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W4 | FLEX | 13.3 | RB29 (11.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | START | 14.0 | RB39 (6.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W2 | START | 14.1 | RB15 (16.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade