Loading…
Andrei Iosivas
WR · CIN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
27.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs TB: allows 31.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs TB
contextNo prior games vs TB in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %53%
Target share8%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
102Average
#11 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
106Easy
#7 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
102Average
#11 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Top Free Agent Fits For WR DeAndre Hopkinsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-22
- AFC Notes: Shedeur Sanders, Zay Flowers, Bengals, Browns, Ravensnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-08
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs CLE | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 8% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs ARI | 6 | 4 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 19% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ MIA | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 3% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs BAL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ BUF | 3 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 8% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @BAL | 2 | 1 | 29 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 5% | 9.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs NE | 7 | 4 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 83% | 21% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W11 | @ PIT | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 10% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs CHI | 7 | 5 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 84% | 16% | 18.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs NYJ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 9% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vsPIT | 4 | 3 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 9% | 7.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ GB | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 10% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W5 | vs DET | 7 | 5 | 82 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 18% | 13.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DEN | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 90% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs JAX | 5 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 12% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @PIT | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 7% | 3.2 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim88%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 91%
of 33 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CLE | SIT | 6.2 | WR73 (3.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | ARI | SIT | 5.8 | WR43 (8.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | MIA | SIT | 7.4 | WR89 (3.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | BAL | SIT | 8.0 | WR135 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | BUF | SIT | 9.7 | WR68 (3.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | BAL | SIT | 9.1 | WR37 (9.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | NE | SIT | 7.9 | WR31 (10.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | PIT | SIT | 7.8 | WR61 (5.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CHI | SIT | 7.8 | WR13 (18.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W8 | NYJ | SIT | 7.8 | WR114 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade