
Why: low total
vs LAC: allows 10.5 PPR/g to TE, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 | vs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 60% | 11% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 8 | 7 | 91 | 0 | 63% | 28% | 16.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 70% | 5% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 66% | 2% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 41% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 35% | 5% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 37% | 7% | 3.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 40% | 10% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | 45% | 5% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 29% | 7% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 15% | 3% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 3 | 2 | 45 | 0 | 40% | 12% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 30% | 7% | 1.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.4 | TE28 (5.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.1 | TE88 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.8 | TE6 (16.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.4 | TE57 (1.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 2.9 | TE57 (1.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.3 | TE36 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 3.7 | TE84 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 3.8 | TE53 (1.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.5 | TE30 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 2.4 | TE32 (6.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade