
Why: projected outside startable range
vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 9 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 28% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 2 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 10% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 15% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 10 | 4 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 28% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 3 | 2 | 41 | 1 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 14.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 1 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 6% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 4 | 4 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 13% | 12.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 7 | 5 | 62 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 22% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 5 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 23% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 6 | 3 | 31 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 15% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 3 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 20% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 13% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 3 | 2 | 61 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 8% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 32 | 1 | – | – | 80% | 14% | 10.2 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 85% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 3% | 2.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 9.0 | WR30 (9.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 8.2 | WR56 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.6 | WR102 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.8 | WR41 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.2 | WR19 (14.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.9 | WR70 (3.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.2 | WR27 (12.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.5 | WR34 (11.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.8 | WR64 (4.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 6.9 | WR71 (4.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade