Loading…
Malik Washington
WR · MIA
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
18.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs LV: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs LV
contextvs LV: 1 game, 4.8 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W11 |  MIA | vs LV | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4.8 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %70%
Target share18%
Opportunities6
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Hard
#23 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
93Hard
#30 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Hard
#23 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- AFC East: Can Bills, Jets or Dolphins unseat the P...www.espn.com · 2026-07-10
- Fantasy Football: Late-round wide receiver targets for 2026 fantasy draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-09
- AFC Notes: Tutu Atwell, Harold Landry, Dolphins, Jets, Patriotsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-04
- Offseason report cards for all 32 NFL teams: Our g...www.espn.com · 2026-06-30
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ NE | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 70% | 18% | 11.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs TB | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 64% | 14% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W16 | vs CIN | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 53% | 4% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ PIT | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 4% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ NYJ | 4 | 3 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 19% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs NO | 5 | 4 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 25% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs WSH | 3 | 3 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 50% | 15% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs BUF | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 45% | 14% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs BAL | 3 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 70% | 8% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W8 | @ ATL | 5 | 4 | 36 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 19% | 13.6 |
| 2025 W7 | @ CLE | 8 | 5 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 27% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs LAC | 5 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 44% | 17% | 6.3 |
| 2025 W5 | @ CAR | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 15% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vsNYJ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 48% | 12% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @BUF | 5 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 54% | 15% | 6.2 |
| 2025 W2 | vsNE | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 61% | 7% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W1 | @ IND | 5 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 58% | 17% | 4.9 |
| 2024 W18 | @NYJ | 5 | 4 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 14% | 8.8 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim97%hit rate
29 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 97%
of 29 Sit calls
Based on 29 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NE | SIT | 4.8 | WR19 (11.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | TB | SIT | 6.1 | WR108 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | CIN | SIT | 6.7 | WR34 (10.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | PIT | SIT | 7.5 | WR90 (2.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | NYJ | SIT | 7.8 | WR64 (4.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | NO | SIT | 8.2 | WR50 (7.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | WSH | SIT | 9.5 | WR44 (7.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | BUF | SIT | 9.0 | WR37 (9.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | BAL | SIT | 9.1 | WR51 (7.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | ATL | SIT | 7.7 | WR25 (13.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade