
Why: projected outside startable range





vs WSH: allows 34.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 8/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Dak Prescott. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (385/589). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR10), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
He was pushed down the depth chart by George Pickens in 2022 and was traded to the Bears at the deadline.
source ↗The sides have reached deals in back-to-back offseasons, as Dallas traded for wide receiver George Pickens in May 2025 and offensive tackle Broderick Jones on Aug.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 0% | 20% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 45% | 14% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 5 | 4 | 78 | 0 | 87% | 14% | 11.8 | 9.8 | 7.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 7 | 130 | 1 | 88% | 30% | 26.0 | 22.5 | 19.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 6 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 86% | 18% | 6.3 | 4.8 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 9 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 84% | 19% | 8.7 | 6.2 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 13 | 6 | 88 | 0 | 74% | 35% | 16.8 | 13.8 | 10.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 9 | 146 | 1 | 78% | 27% | 29.6 | 25.1 | 20.6 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 11 | 9 | 144 | 1 | 67% | 38% | 29.4 | 24.9 | 20.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 9 | 6 | 79 | 0 | 91% | 25% | 13.9 | 10.9 | 7.9 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 7 | 78 | 0 | 80% | 26% | 14.8 | 11.3 | 7.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 6 | 4 | 82 | 0 | 84% | 21% | 12.2 | 10.2 | 8.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 11 | 9 | 168 | 1 | 84% | 34% | 31.8 | 27.3 | 22.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 2 | 57 | 1 | 78% | 15% | 13.7 | 12.7 | 11.7 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 11 | 8 | 134 | 2 | 90% | 30% | 33.4 | 29.4 | 25.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 9 | 5 | 68 | 1 | 82% | 21% | 17.8 | 15.3 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 9 | 5 | 68 | 1 | 89% | 17% | 17.8 | 15.3 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 92% | 12% | 6.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 12.4 | WR86 (1.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 14.5 | WR29 (11.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.0 | WR4 (26.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 16.6 | WR59 (6.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 17.2 | WR36 (8.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 16.3 | WR17 (16.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 14.5 | WR4 (29.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.0 | WR3 (29.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 14.3 | WR27 (13.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 15.4 | WR17 (14.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade