
Why: limited usage
vs ATL: allows 9.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W1 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 14% | 5% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 68% | 11% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 73% | 15% | 5.5 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 29% | 3% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 2 | 45 | 0 | 79% | 18% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 68% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 5 | 4 | 67 | 0 | 71% | 17% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 48% | 4% | 2.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 66% | 17% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 63% | 16% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 5 | 3 | 62 | 0 | 80% | 18% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 91% | 14% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 3% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 35% | 3% | 1.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 5.8 | TE39 (3.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.6 | TE33 (4.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.2 | TE27 (5.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 6.1 | TE42 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.2 | TE26 (6.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.4 | TE33 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.7 | TE9 (10.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.7 | TE39 (2.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.6 | TE23 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 6.4 | TE75 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade