
Why: projected outside startable range
vs DAL: allows 12.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Marcus Mariota. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (104/426). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE69), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 2 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 59% | 11% | 9.3 | 8.3 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50% | 5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 69% | 6% | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 51% | 4% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 70% | 9% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 4 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 49% | 19% | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 55% | 3% | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 43% | 7% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 51% | 4% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 52% | 3% | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.2 | TE15 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.9 | TE75 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.6 | TE76 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.8 | TE45 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 4.2 | TE69 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.1 | TE41 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 4.7 | TE66 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.6 | TE46 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 2.7 | TE37 (4.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 1.9 | TE35 (3.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade