
Why: limited usage
vs BUF: allows 23.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 8/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 7.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
David Montgomery, RB (traded to Houston Texans) The Texans brought in Montgomery to upgrade a run game that averaged 3.9 yards per carry in 2025 (fourth lowest).
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 8 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 34% | 7% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 7 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 3% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 6 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 14.3 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 8 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 38% | 7% | 12.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 5 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 34% | 8% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 6 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 39% | 3% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 15 | 71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 54% | 3% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 11 | 40 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 38% | 11% | 11.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 13 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 44% | 11% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 4 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 0 | 31% | 7% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 18 | 65 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 53% | 4% | 18.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 9 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 4% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 12 | 151 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 37% | 4% | 29.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 11 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 39% | 4% | 13.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 11 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 37% | 11% | 8.3 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 30% | 8% | 7.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.2 | RB36 (6.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 8.1 | RB39 (6.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 9.5 | RB62 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.4 | RB32 (9.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 9.7 | RB19 (14.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 9.1 | RB22 (12.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 10.7 | RB33 (6.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 8.9 | RB45 (4.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB29 (10.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 9.6 | RB21 (11.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade