
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup




vs BUF: allows 26.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jared Goff. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (152/374). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR20), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 3 | 37 | 1 | 12.7 | 11.2 | 9.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams did not practice on Sunday. These aren’t serious.” Jameson Williams out of practice with a minor shoulder injury
source ↗Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams did not practice on Sunday. These aren’t serious.” Jameson Williams out of practice with a minor shoulder injury
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 9 | 4 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 8 | 6 | 74 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 22% | 13.4 | 10.4 | 7.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 2 | 37 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 10% | 5.7 | 4.7 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 5 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 17% | 12.0 | 9.5 | 7.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 10 | 7 | 134 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 26% | 26.4 | 22.9 | 19.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 9 | 7 | 96 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 92% | 29% | 17.3 | 13.8 | 10.3 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 10 | 7 | 144 | 1 | 1 | -5 | 94% | 37% | 26.9 | 23.4 | 19.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 8% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 7 | 4 | 88 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 95% | 19% | 19.7 | 17.7 | 15.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 6 | 119 | 1 | – | – | 87% | 22% | 23.9 | 20.9 | 17.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 4 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 17% | 16.6 | 14.6 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 7 | 6 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 26% | 18.6 | 15.6 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 82% | 4% | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 8 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 85% | 32% | 5.7 | 4.7 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 12% | 6.3 | 5.3 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 2 | 108 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 14% | 18.8 | 17.8 | 16.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 5 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 97% | 13% | 6.6 | 4.6 | 2.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 13.1 | WR16 (13.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 16.6 | WR54 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.3 | WR29 (12.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 13.9 | WR3 (26.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.3 | WR12 (17.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.9 | WR4 (26.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 12.5 | WR122 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 11.3 | WR8 (19.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.6 | WR2 (23.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 9.7 | WR19 (16.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade