
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs NO: allows 27.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 22/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W13 | @ | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 10.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 8 | 6 | 74 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 22% | 13.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 2 | 37 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 10% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 5 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 17% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 10 | 7 | 134 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 26% | 26.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 9 | 7 | 96 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 92% | 29% | 17.3 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 10 | 7 | 144 | 1 | 1 | -5 | 94% | 37% | 26.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 8% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 7 | 4 | 88 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 95% | 19% | 19.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 6 | 119 | 1 | – | – | 87% | 22% | 23.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 4 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 17% | 16.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 7 | 6 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 26% | 18.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 82% | 4% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 8 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 85% | 32% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 12% | 6.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 2 | 108 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 14% | 18.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 5 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 97% | 13% | 6.6 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 8 | 6 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 25% | 9.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 13.1 | WR16 (13.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 16.6 | WR54 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.3 | WR29 (12.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 13.9 | WR3 (26.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.3 | WR12 (17.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.9 | WR4 (26.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 12.5 | WR122 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 11.3 | WR8 (19.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.6 | WR2 (23.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 9.7 | WR19 (16.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade