Loading…
vs CLE: allows 26.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Aaron Rodgers. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (231/514). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR31), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Pittman might not offer DK Metcalf's explosive play ability, but he's projected to lead the Steelers in targets and receptions.
source ↗Ben Skowronek has been ruled out, which leaves DK Metcalf, Germie Bernard, and Kaden Wetjen as the healthy wideouts on the active roster in Pittsburgh.
source ↗
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @NO | 6 | 2 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @TB | 15 | 11 | 93 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 34% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vsIND | 4 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 92% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @CLE | 9 | 5 | 115 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vsCIN | 5 | 3 | 31 | 1 | – | – | 95% | 16% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | @NE | 9 | 4 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 24% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | vsATL | 10 | 4 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 27% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W16 | @ DET | 9 | 4 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 24% | 8.2 | 6.2 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W15 | vs MIA | 3 | 3 | 55 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 11% | 14.5 | 13.0 | 11.5 |
| 2025 W14 | @ BAL | 12 | 7 | 148 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 36% | 21.8 | 18.3 | 14.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs BUF | 5 | 3 | 32 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 23% | 6.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W12 | @ CHI | 8 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 85% | 27% | 14.4 | 11.9 | 9.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vsCIN | 8 | 5 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 28% | 9.9 | 7.4 | 4.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ LAC | 7 | 3 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 25% | 6.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vsIND | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 11% | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs GB | 7 | 5 | 55 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 23% | 16.5 | 14.0 | 11.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @CIN | 5 | 3 | 50 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 16% | 8.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vsCLE | 9 | 4 | 95 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 32% | 19.5 | 17.5 | 15.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.