
Why: limited usage
vs LAR: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
No availability flags or recent headlines.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 16% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 7% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 2 | 2 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 44% | 6% | 10.3 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 2 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 43% | 5% | 0.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 9% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 3 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 11% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 10% | 4.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 2 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 19% | 8% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 7 | 3 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 16% | 6.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 2 | 1 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 6% | 3.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 3 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 15% | 10.2 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 4% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 4.5 | WR52 (5.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.7 | WR64 (5.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.1 | WR33 (10.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 4.9 | WR64 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.7 | WR106 (0.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.3 | WR87 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 4.5 | WR81 (2.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.7 | WR49 (6.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 5.9 | WR99 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 4.7 | WR65 (4.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade